Provide quantitative perfusion information in brain tissue for suspected ischemic stroke patients using dynamic brain CT perfusion studies; medical imaging professionals use the information as additional data in the standard-of-care assessment, not as a standalone diagnostic tool.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Provide quantitative perfusion information in brain tissue for suspected ischemic stroke patients using dynamic brain CT perfusion studies; medical imaging professionals use the information as additional data in the standard-of-care assessment, not as a standalone diagnostic tool.
Post-acquisition CT-perfusion viewing, processing, and quantitative analysis as an adjunct to standard-of-care interpretation; the output is reviewed in the clinical context and is not standalone diagnosis.
DICOM-compliant dynamic brain CT perfusion images from suspected ischemic-stroke patients in the adult population. The FDA comparison states that this submission does not support CTA or MR data for the Perfusion algorithm.
Colored perfusion maps and quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF), Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV), Mean Transit Time (MTT), residue-function time-to-peak (TMax), Arterial Input Function (AIF), and affected-tissue volume calculations based on TMax and CBF abnormalities; results are exported as DICOM series and DICOM reports to a preconfigured destination for compatible DICOM-viewer review.
Not a standalone diagnostic tool and must be interpreted with patient information. The Perfusion algorithm is limited to brain CT perfusion rather than CTA or MR. The FDA indication identifies absent or inadequate bolus, excessive motion causing technically inadequate scans, and hemorrhage as contraindications; the packet does not establish a specific current PACS, RIS, EHR, or deployment configuration.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The software is packaged as a Docker container for a standard off-the-shelf computer or virtual platform, extracts DICOM information, and exports DICOM series and reports to a preconfigured destination for compatible DICOM-viewer review. Exact current interface, PACS/RIS/EHR, and deployment details are not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for StrokeViewer Perfusion; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA K231570 states that clinical data were not required. Nonclinical verification and validation included unit, end-to-end, and reproducibility testing, plus bench performance testing on simulated Kudo digital-phantom datasets comparing device output with ground truth; the packet states that performance goals and acceptance criteria were met.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
Costs and setup
Budget and ongoing governance
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K231570 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K231570. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K231570 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
20Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Rapid CTA 360 analyzes adult head CTA DICOM images to flag suspected large- and medium-vessel occlusion in specified intracranial and vertebral segments and notify trained...
Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS registers adult non-contrast brain CT, segments ASPECTS regions, and provides an editable ASPECTS score with highlighted regions and voxel contribution...
Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS is a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) software device used to assist the clinician in the assessment and characterization of brain tissue abnormalities...