Automatic MRI segmentation and quantitative analysis of muscle, bone, fat, and other anatomical structures to assist visualization and measurement; not direct disease diagnosis.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Automatic MRI segmentation and quantitative analysis of muscle, bone, fat, and other anatomical structures to assist visualization and measurement; not direct disease diagnosis.
DICOM MRI data from adults and pediatric patients aged 18 and older; the submission describes 1.5T and 3.0T imaging and validation/model data across GE, Siemens, Philips, Canon, and Toshiba, with Toshiba limited to AI Setting 1 in the comparison.
Automatic segmentations and volumetric/dimensional metrics for individual and grouped ROIs such as muscles, bones, and adipose tissue; comparative analysis against a Virtual Control Group; Z-scores and composite scores such as a muscle-bone score.
Not intended for patients with tumors in the trunk, arms, and/or lower limbs. Segmentation results require review and editing using appropriate software. The packet establishes assistive information that may assist diagnosis when interpreted by a trained clinician, not direct standalone diagnosis.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The device accepts DICOM MRI data but the FDA description says it does not directly interface with imaging devices. The reviewed packet does not establish a specific PACS, RIS, EHR, routing, or export interface.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for MuscleView 2.0; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA testing used an independent, ground-truth-blinded test set of 148 subjects after training on 1,294 unique subjects. Expert manual segmentation was the reference standard. ROI and subgroup validation used Dice similarity coefficient or volume difference and required performance within predefined interobserver-variability acceptance ranges. The packet provides ROI/subgroup confidence intervals rather than a single device-level sensitivity, specificity, or diagnostic-accuracy estimate.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
MuscleView 2.0 regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K251682
Samplen=148
IndependenceIndependence not established
K251682
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K251682 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K251682. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify deployment and data flow: The reviewed sources do not establish the current exact-release hosting topology, data flow, region, tenancy, or disaster-recovery configuration.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K251682 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Assist physicians in reviewing previously acquired lumbar-spine MRI by providing user-confirmed anatomy identification, segmentation, labeling, measurements, and reporting; it is...
Modality
MRI
Anatomy
Lumbar spine, including vertebral bodies L1-S1, intervertebral discs, cord canal, dural sac, nerve roots, and posterior arch.
RemedyLogic AI MRI Lumbar Spine Reader (“RAI”) is an image post-processing and measurement software tool that provides quantitative spine measurements from previously-acquired...