Computer-assisted reading aid for radiologists detecting pulmonary nodules during review of chest CT examinations in an asymptomatic population; both lungs must be in the field of view, and the original CT series must remain available.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Computer-assisted reading aid for radiologists detecting pulmonary nodules during review of chest CT examinations in an asymptomatic population; both lungs must be in the field of view, and the original CT series must remain available.
Adjunctive concurrent computer-assisted detection and annotation during radiologist review; it does not replace the original CT series or establish an independent diagnosis.
Pulmonary-nodule annotations, including bounding boxes and nodule characteristics such as maximum axial-plane diameter, mean diameter, and volume, viewable with the original CT series.
The device is adjunctive and must not be used without the original CT series; the indication is chest CT in an asymptomatic population with both lungs visible. The packet does not establish a standalone clinical diagnosis or current commercial release configuration.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Browser/server SaaS via URL with modules for image reception, predictive processing, storage, and display; the server can receive images from PACS, RIS, or CT scanners and users can view annotations in an existing PACS. Dedicated servers may be located at hospitals; exact current interfaces and hosting configuration are not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for InferRead Lung CT.AI; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
Non-clinical testing reported similar nodule-detection sensitivity and false positives per scan to the predicate but no numeric standalone sensitivity or specificity in the reviewed summary. A retrospective fully crossed MRMC reader study used 10 board-certified radiologists and 249 scans; LROC AUC improved aided versus unaided by 0.073 (95% CI 0.020-0.125), and reading time changed by -23 seconds (95% CI -42 to -3). AUC change and latency are distinct reader-study endpoints, not sensitivity or specificity.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
InferRead Lung CT.AI regulatory performance study summary
DesignReader Study
PopulationPopulation described in the exact-submission ACR model card
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K192880
IndependenceIndependence not established
K192880
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K192880 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K192880. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K192880 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
1Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 1 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Concurrent-reader aid for a radiologist detecting pulmonary nodules during review of chest CT examinations in the lung cancer screening population under screening protocols.
eyonis LCS is a concurrent-reading aid for radiologists that detects, localizes, and characterizes 4-30 mm solid and part-solid pulmonary nodules on low-dose chest CT images for...
Characterization and relative cancer-risk assessment of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules 6-15 mm in adults, with use as one input to follow-up and clinical decision-making...
Adjunctive pulmonary nodule detection and measurement, including temporal comparison, in chest CT screening of asymptomatic adults aged at least 55 years.