Characterization and relative cancer-risk assessment of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules 6-15 mm in adults, with use as one input to follow-up and clinical decision-making under published guidelines; not lung-cancer screening
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Characterization and relative cancer-risk assessment of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules 6-15 mm in adults, with use as one input to follow-up and clinical decision-making under published guidelines; not lung-cancer screening
User-selected CADx adjunct during routine lung CT interpretation: the radiologist identifies the nodule, opens an integrated MIMPS frame, and considers mSI with other risk factors and guidelines
DICOM CT image plus a spatial coordinate centered on a user-selected lung nodule; incidentally detected 6-15 mm pulmonary nodule in a patient aged 18 years or above; validation excluded CT images with missing slices
Malignancy similarity index (mSI) from 0 to 1 for each selected nodule, plus a histogram relating the score to benign and malignant NLST reference cases; mSI is a relative risk score and not a percentage cancer risk
Not indicated for lung-cancer screening, modalities other than lung CT, non-lung-nodule locations, or unassisted reads; intended indication is adult incidentally detected nodules 6-15 mm; missing CT slices were excluded from validation
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Imports DICOM from connected third-party devices, interfaces with an established MIMPS system, and displays analytics in an integrated frame; the packet says it does not display DICOM images and does not provide reporting-archive connectivity. Specific PACS/RIS interfaces and versions are not established
The reviewed sources do not establish the current exact-release hosting topology, data flow, region, tenancy, or disaster-recovery configuration.
Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
ACR exact-submission catalog context
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for RevealAI-Lung; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA packet reports validation on 675 patients, including 276 with cancer, across additional US, Canadian, and UK populations. The MRMC study used 108 cases and 10 radiologists with a 28-day washout. Primary endpoint was reader AUC: mean 0.538 unaided versus 0.719 aided, delta 0.181, p<0.0001. At a prespecified 5% malignancy-likelihood threshold, reader sensitivity changed from 0.68 to 0.82 and specificity from 0.344 to 0.467; the packet cautions these are sample-dependent and not population statistics
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
RevealAI-Lung regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-alone performance and reader study (ACR AI Central category)
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K251769
Samplen=675
IndependenceIndependence not established
K251769
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K251769 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K251769. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify deployment and data flow: The reviewed sources do not establish the current exact-release hosting topology, data flow, region, tenancy, or disaster-recovery configuration.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K251769 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
20Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
2Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 2 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, acr ai central product, fda decision summary, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Concurrent-reader aid for a radiologist detecting pulmonary nodules during review of chest CT examinations in the lung cancer screening population under screening protocols.
eyonis LCS is a concurrent-reading aid for radiologists that detects, localizes, and characterizes 4-30 mm solid and part-solid pulmonary nodules on low-dose chest CT images for...
Adjunctive pulmonary nodule detection and measurement, including temporal comparison, in chest CT screening of asymptomatic adults aged at least 55 years.