Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Quantification and reporting of cardiovascular function to support physician diagnosis in adult populations.
DICOM echocardiogram clips from apical two-, three-, and four-chamber views, with heart-rate information or operator-supported selection when ECG is unavailable.
The operator must confirm or relabel views, approve contours and frame selection, and review the report and cautions; the packet establishes adult cardiovascular-function quantification and reporting, not an autonomous diagnosis or unreviewed measurement workflow.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The device operates on DICOM echocardiogram clips and produces secondary-capture and/or structured DICOM reports; exact PACS, RIS, EHR, interface, and version compatibility are not established.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for EchoGo Core (2.0); FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
A retrospective validation study used 214 previously unseen studies from multiple ultrasound manufacturers, with training and test data segregated. RMS error versus a comparator ranged from 3.06%-4.59% for LV length, 8.57%-16.59% for ED/ES volume, 6.69%-8.50% for ejection fraction, 10.57%-13.68% for stroke volume, 3.36%-4.79% for GLS, and 5.51%-9.98% for systolic segmental strain. Inter- and intra-operator Deming RMSE were reported as 0 for all report metrics. These are measurement-error and repeatability endpoints, not sensitivity or specificity.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
EchoGo Core (2.0) regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K213275
Samplen=214
IndependenceIndependence not established
K213275
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K213275 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K213275. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify deployment and data flow: The reviewed sources do not establish the current exact-release hosting topology, data flow, region, tenancy, or disaster-recovery configuration.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K213275 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
1Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 1 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Ligence Heart is a fully automated software platform that processes, analyses and makes measurements on acquired transthoracic cardiac ultrasound images, automatically producing a...
Provides AI-assisted cardiac, lung and abdominal quality feedback and measurements; users remain responsible for scan quality and diagnosis and must not rely solely on the...
PVAD IQ supports qualified-physician clinical decision support by identifying the aortic annulus and PVAD inlet, calculating their mean distance, and identifying clips acceptable...