FDA-cleared profile
Screenpoint Medical B.V.
Concurrent computer-aided detection for screening full-field digital mammography presents suspicious-region marks and scores for physician review.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Public materials reviewed for this exact release do not establish the complete security posture. Request data-flow, identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote-access, vulnerability-management, backup, and incident-response evidence.
Map the installed model, build, options, population, anatomy, inputs, and outputs to K192287 before acceptance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Later product-family features are not evidence that this cleared release includes them.
Validate supported acquisition systems, image type and processing, DICOM transfer, hanging protocols, display requirements, result presentation, and archive retention.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Test representative identifiers, orientation, geometry, measurements, units, routing, failure handling, and round trips locally.
Use a signed local test set for the supported population and workflow. Include common and difficult cases, exclusions, acquisition variation, failed or low-quality inputs, reviewer overrides, and downstream effects. Results are adjunctive and cannot serve as the sole basis for interpretation, diagnosis, or management; image type, vendor, view, and population limits apply.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Define stop-use, escalation, rollback, and revalidation triggers before production use.
Model capital and recurring cost against net staff time after review, throughput, repeat imaging or rework, room time, consumables, infrastructure, training, service, downtime, upgrade, and replacement costs.
product family · checked 2026-09-03Vendor productivity claims are scenario inputs, not guaranteed local savings.
Monitor by exact hardware, software and model version, patient population, anatomy, protocol, operator, input quality, output edits or overrides, failed studies, repeat acquisition or rework, downstream impact, downtime, incidents, recalls, and updates. Track these product-specific limits: Results are adjunctive and cannot serve as the sole basis for interpretation, diagnosis, or management; image type, vendor, view, and population limits apply.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Revalidate after material software, hardware, model, protocol, interface, or clinical-policy changes.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Sensitivity is not the primary endpoint for this acquisition, reconstruction, segmentation, guidance, or quantitative function. Use the task-specific evidence below.
Specificity is not the primary endpoint for this acquisition, reconstruction, segmentation, guidance, or quantitative function. Use the task-specific evidence below.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K192287
Manufacturer evidence submitted for clearance or approval; local clinical, technical, and workflow acceptance remains necessary.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public list price for the exact cleared configuration was found. Obtain a written quote separating hardware or license basis, enabled features, implementation, interfaces, infrastructure, training, service, upgrades, renewal, consumables, and exit costs.
No separate named-product payment identified in reviewed public material
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · United StatesBuild a local total-cost and value model; do not infer reimbursement from FDA clearance or approval.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Exact-identifier review does not prove absence of all product-family safety signals.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA materials, available current product-family sources, reimbursement context, and exact-identifier postmarket results were reviewed. Pricing, contracted services, enabled options, final security architecture, and local interoperability remain organization-specific evidence. Automated exact-name discovery found 18 PubMed and 6 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda decision material, vendor product page, reimbursement policy, fda device recall, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, purpose, modality, anatomy
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: coverage, codingContext
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: integration, deployment, monitoring, productFamilyContext
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
human reviewed
Alternatives
DeepHealth, Inc.
Concurrent detection and characterization support for screening DBT mammography
Lunit, Inc.
Lunit INSIGHT MMG v1.1.10 aids physicians in detection, localization and characterization of suspicious breast-cancer areas on female screening mammograms from compatible FFDM...
Lunit, Inc.
Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize breast-cancer-suspicious lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems, marking soft-tissue...
Hologic, Inc.
Genius AI Detection 2.0 analyzes compatible digital breast tomosynthesis exams to identify and mark soft-tissue densities (masses, architectural distortions, asymmetries) and...