Assist radiologists in detecting solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules during review of multivendor multi-detector CT examinations of the chest; the device is an adjunctive first- or second-reader tool.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Assist radiologists in detecting solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules during review of multivendor multi-detector CT examinations of the chest; the device is an adjunctive first- or second-reader tool.
Concurrent first-reader support followed by full radiologist review, or second-reader support after the initial read; solid-only mode filters suspected subsolid and fully calcified findings.
Multivendor multi-detector chest CT examinations; the FDA device description specifies solid nodules of 3.0-30.0 mm and subsolid nodules of 5.0-30.0 mm average diameter, with 16 or more detector rows recommended.
A list of nodule candidate locations sent to a visualization application or rendering component, which generates image series with CAD marks superimposed on thoracic CT images for radiologist review.
The device is an adjunct and requires full radiologist review. The solid-only mode excludes potential subsolid and fully calcified findings. The FDA packet states that the algorithm has no user-interface component and that the hosting application is responsible for displaying CAD marks; the stated nodule sizes and 16-row recommendation bound the described device context.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The FDA packet identifies a hosting visualization application such as syngo MM Oncology and the syngo.via framework as examples for displaying marks; it does not establish a universal PACS/RIS/EHR interface, current version compatibility, or local deployment configuration.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for syngo.CT Lung CAD (Version VD30); FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
The standalone comparison used the same retrospectively collected 712 thoracic CT cases as the predicate evaluation: 232 UCLA cases, 145 original PMA cases, and 335 additional cases. There were 929 true nodules from 412 cases; across 3,560 lung lobes, 647 contained at least one true nodule and 2,913 contained none. Reference standards differed by source, using the UCLA reader study, 18-reader consensus for PMA cases, and 7-reader consensus for additional cases. The packet states that all primary and secondary endpoints were met but does not provide a single observed sensitivity, specificity, or AUC value in the reviewed text.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
syngo.CT Lung CAD (Version VD30) regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationPopulation described in the exact-submission ACR model card
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K231157
Samplen=712
IndependenceIndependence not established
K231157
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K231157 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K231157. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K231157 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
eyonis LCS is a concurrent-reading aid for radiologists that detects, localizes, and characterizes 4-30 mm solid and part-solid pulmonary nodules on low-dose chest CT images for...
Adjunctive pulmonary nodule detection and measurement, including temporal comparison, in chest CT screening of asymptomatic adults aged at least 55 years.
AVIEW Lung Nodule CAD is a Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) software designed to assist radiologists in the detection of pulmonary nodules (with diameter 3-20 mm) during the review...
AI-Rad Companion (Pulmonary) is image processing software that provides quantitative and qualitative analysis from previously acquired Computed Tomography DICOM images to support...