Passive worklist prioritization for suspected pleural effusion and/or pneumothorax on frontal PA or AP chest radiographs in transitional adolescents aged 18-21 and adults aged 22 years and older; not diagnostic or a rule-out function.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Passive worklist prioritization for suspected pleural effusion and/or pneumothorax on frontal PA or AP chest radiographs in transitional adolescents aged 18-21 and adults aged 22 years and older; not diagnostic or a rule-out function.
Passive notification and worklist prioritization in parallel with standard of care; the device does not send a proactive alert, reorder or remove cases, or direct attention to a specific image location.
Frontal PA or AP chest X-ray images from transitional adolescents aged 18-21 and adults aged 22 years and older, received from PACS or other DICOM storage; lateral views and excluded ages are not processed.
A newly generated DICOM secondary-capture series with study-level status and tags such as CASE PROCESSED, NOT PROCESSED, SUSPECTED FINDING, SUSPECTED PLEURAL EFFUSION, and SUSPECTED PNEUMOTHORAX, plus the number of images received and processed.
Prioritization only; the contextual notification is not diagnostic, is not intended for standalone clinical decision-making, and is not a rule-out result. Unflagged studies still require specialist interpretation, the device does not direct attention to a specific image portion, and out-of-scope views or ages are not processed.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Chest radiographs are automatically received from PACS or other DICOM storage and results are passively returned as a new DICOM series to the worklist platform. The packet describes local and cloud server execution contexts but does not establish a specific PACS/RIS interface, version, or current deployment model.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for SmartChest; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA K232410 reports two independent standalone performance assessments, each using 300 US chest X-ray cases and a reference standard formed by majority consensus of three ABR-certified cardiothoracic radiologists. For pneumothorax, AUC was 0.989, sensitivity 92.7% (95% CI 87.4-96.2), and specificity 97.3% (95% CI 93.4-99.1). For pleural effusion, AUC was 0.975 (95% CI 0.960-0.987), sensitivity 93.3% (95% CI 88.1-96.4), and specificity 90.0% (95% CI 84.1-94.1). Execution time was reported separately for local and cloud servers.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
SmartChest regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K232410
Samplen=300
IndependenceIndependence not established
K232410
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K232410 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K232410. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K232410 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
24Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Passive study-level worklist triage for suspected pneumothorax and/or pleural effusion on adult PA or AP chest X-rays; it is not a proactive specialist alert.
Passive triage of adult AP chest radiographs for an endotracheal-tube tip more than 7 cm above the carina, less than 3 cm above the carina, below the carina in the right or left...
VUNO Med-Chest X-ray Triage/VUNO Med-CXR Link Triage is a radiological computer-assisted triage and notification software that analyzes adult chest X-ray images for the presence...