Concurrent reading aid for interpreting physicians on screening DBT mammograms to detect and characterize soft-tissue lesions and calcifications that may indicate cancer.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Concurrent reading aid for interpreting physicians on screening DBT mammograms to detect and characterize soft-tissue lesions and calcifications that may indicate cancer.
Finding-level bounding boxes, Finding Suspicion Level for each finding, aggregate Case Suspicion Level, DICOM SR markings for overlay, and DICOM SC summary report.
Adjunct only; not a replacement for complete physician review or clinical judgment, and decisions should not be based solely on Saige-Dx analysis. Intended population is women 35+ undergoing screening mammography with compatible DBT hardware.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Mammography studies are routed from the healthcare facility to the software and results return to PACS or other worklist software; DICOM SR/SC outputs are described, with an Ephemeral deployment option.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA K241747 packet reports standalone testing on 1,804 women aged 35-89: 236 cancer and 1,568 non-cancer exams from 12 US sites using Hologic and GE equipment. The case-level AUC on compatible exams was 0.910 (95% CI 0.886-0.933), with the primary non-inferiority comparison against the predicate meeting its prespecified criterion.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
Saige-Dx regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K241747
IndependenceIndependence not established
K241747
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K241747 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K241747. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K241747 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
21Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
1Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 1 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Lunit INSIGHT MMG v1.1.10 aids physicians in detection, localization and characterization of suspicious breast-cancer areas on female screening mammograms from compatible FFDM...
Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize breast-cancer-suspicious lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems, marking soft-tissue...
Genius AI Detection 2.0 analyzes compatible digital breast tomosynthesis exams to identify and mark soft-tissue densities (masses, architectural distortions, asymmetries) and...