DICOM and JSON result pathways
The exact submission describes DICOM mammography input and JSON output, with optional DICOM Structured Report, Secondary Capture, and compatible worklist display.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-06FDA-cleared profile
Therapixel
MammoScreen BD evaluates 2D mammography standard views (CC and/or MLO) from compatible FFDM and/or 2D synthetic mammography from DBT to assign an ACR BI-RADS 5th Edition breast-density category for asymptomatic women aged 40 years or older undergoing screening; it is adjunctive, not diagnostic, and patient management remains with the interpreting physician.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Baseline deployment category preserved; the reviewed sources do not establish current hosting region, retention, or commercial configuration.
No scoped current security, data-flow, access-control, retention, or incident-response documentation was established.
Current onboarding, competency, and support commitments were not established.
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, update control, and drift review were not established.
The exact submission describes DICOM mammography input and JSON output, with optional DICOM Structured Report, Secondary Capture, and compatible worklist display.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-06MammoScreen's official FAQ describes SaaS pricing on a pay-per-successfully-processed-mammogram basis; no amount or contract term is published.
product family · checked 2026-09-07Family-level commercial model only; it is not treated as a price for the K243685 configuration.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
This field has not been curated yet.
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K243685
Reference standard was the consensus of five breast radiologists; exact enrollment count was not used here because it was not consistently exposed in the extracted packet text.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
The reviewed FAQ does not publish an exact amount, currency, geography, or contract term. Cloud de-identification/deletion statements were not treated as a scoped security audit.
No payer or CMS policy review was performed in this worker cohort.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
No stored PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidate identifiers for this submission in the 2026-09-01 snapshot; exact-submission recall candidate review was also zero. This metadata screen is not a full paper review. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, vendor product page, vendor faq, literature index, trial registry, fda device recall, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: identity, purpose, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, input, output, limitations, integration, deployment, evidenceSummary, evidenceStudies
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: intendedUsers, careSetting, output, evidenceSummary, integration, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: productFamilyWorkflow, implementationCapabilities
Scope: pricingModel, implementationCapabilities
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
human reviewed
Alternatives
Therapixel
Flags calcifications, masses, asymmetries and architectural distortions on compatible FFDM or DBT screening examinations; management must not be based solely on MammoScreen output.
DeepHealth, Inc.
Concurrent detection and characterization support for screening DBT mammography
Neurocareai, Inc. (Dba Savelife.Ai)
Tags screening cases as suspicious or blank to aid worklist prioritization; radiologists must review every examination and it does not mark original images.
Lunit, Inc.
Lunit INSIGHT MMG v1.1.10 aids physicians in detection, localization and characterization of suspicious breast-cancer areas on female screening mammograms from compatible FFDM...