Notification-only triage of adult non-contrast head CT for suspected intracranial hemorrhage and large-vessel occlusion, with parallel communication to trained clinicians during standard care.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Notification-only triage of adult non-contrast head CT for suspected intracranial hemorrhage and large-vessel occlusion, with parallel communication to trained clinicians during standard care.
Flags suspected ICH and LVO involving ICA, MCA-M1, and MCA-M2 and sends mobile notifications with compressed preview images for informational/triage use; the original medical image is not modified.
A missing notification must not be treated as excluding ICH or LVO. All patients should receive appropriate care including CTA and/or relevant treatment; the device does not replace CTA or MRA in ischemic-stroke workup. Exclusions include excessive motion, hemorrhagic transformation, and very thin or absent ventricles. Compressed previews are not for diagnosis beyond notification.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
DICOM-compliant AI processing on an on-premises or cloud-based JLK server with a mobile notification module; PACS integration is described as optional and supported when available, and the packet measures notification transmission to PACS and mobile devices.
Cloud-based and on-premises deployment are explicitly described in the exact-submission ACR model card; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration require vendor confirmation.
Public source
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-01
Deployment mode explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; hosting region and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Cloud-based and on-premises deployment are explicitly described in the exact-submission ACR model card; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration require vendor confirmation.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
The standalone evaluation used 288 LVO cases, 144 positive and 144 negative, with an independent ground truth from two US board-certified neuroradiologists plus a third adjudicator. LVO sensitivity was 78.5% (95% CI 71.9-84.7), specificity 90.3% (85.1-94.7), and AUC 0.880 (0.837-0.920). Mean NCCT-to-notification time for suspected LVO was 1.67 +/- 0.10 minutes versus a 2.5 +/- 0.1-minute predicate goal. A reader-performance analysis reports device sensitivity 0.792 and specificity 0.933 versus average reader sensitivity 0.568 and specificity 0.840. The packet states that the ICH algorithm is the same as a previously cleared K243363 algorithm and was not additionally clinically validated here.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
JLK-NCCT regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-alone performance and reader study (ACR AI Central category)
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K252421
Samplen=288
IndependenceIndependence not established
K252421
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K252421 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K252421. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K252421 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
25Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, acr ai central product, fda decision summary, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Methinks CTA Stroke analyzes acute-setting brain CT angiography in adults over 21 with suspected stroke for suspected large-vessel occlusion in the terminal ICA, MCA-M1, or MCA-M2...
Rapid CTA 360 analyzes adult head CTA DICOM images to flag suspected large- and medium-vessel occlusion in specified intracranial and vertebral segments and notify trained...