FDA-cleared profile

DeepContour (V1.0)

Wisdom Technologies., Inc.

DeepContour uses deep-learning CT processing to generate editable organ contours and RTSTRUCT objects for selected adult radiation-treatment planning workflows, with quantitative statistics, registration, and three-dimensional visualization.

Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.

Clinical details

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
DeepContour uses deep-learning CT processing to generate editable organ contours and RTSTRUCT objects for selected adult radiation-treatment planning workflows, with quantitative statistics, registration, and three-dimensional visualization.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Intended users
Qualified radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Care setting and population
Radiation-oncology departments using compatible planning, imaging, and treatment-delivery systems.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Workflow role
Radiotherapy contouring, treatment planning, adaptation, or treatment-session management under professional review.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Required input
Supported CT or MR images, structures, prescriptions, plans, registrations, and treatment-session data.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Output and human action
Contours, treatment plans, adapted plans, dose or evaluation results, or session-management information requiring review and approval.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Limitations
DeepContour is not for lesion or tumor contouring. Validate the exact organ template, CT protocol, registration, RTSTRUCT export, and local review process; no generated contour may be used for treatment without qualified approval.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K232928
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Anatomy
Multi-region
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Clearance type
510(k)
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2024-05-07
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
DICOM RT and vendor workflow integration; validate patient identity, image geometry, structures, dose, plan transfer, approvals, version compatibility, and rollback.
  • Public source
  • Product family
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Current vendor materials are product-family evidence for K232928; confirm the exact cleared version, enabled options, deployment, and local compatibility.

Deployment and data flow
Licensed software connected to compatible radiotherapy planning and delivery infrastructure.
  • Public source
  • Product family
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Current vendor materials are product-family evidence for K232928; confirm the exact cleared version, enabled options, deployment, and local compatibility.

Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
  • Vendor confirmation
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Public materials reviewed for this exact release do not establish the complete security posture. Request data-flow, identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote-access, vulnerability-management, backup, and incident-response evidence.

Training and support
Only qualified radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists should operate or interpret the product. Local onboarding should cover the exact release, supported population, limitations, failure examples, escalation, downtime, and competency documentation.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Monitoring and change control
Monitor by exact hardware, software, model, and algorithm version; patient population; anatomy; protocol; operator; input quality; output edits or overrides; failed studies; repeat acquisition or rework; downstream impact; downtime; incidents; recalls; and updates. Track these product-specific limits: DeepContour is not for lesion or tumor contouring. Validate the exact organ template, CT protocol, registration, RTSTRUCT export, and local review process; no generated contour may be used for treatment without qualified approval.
  • Public source
  • Product family
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Current vendor materials are product-family evidence for K232928; confirm the exact cleared version, enabled options, deployment, and local compatibility.

Release and scope verification

Map the installed model, build, options, population, anatomy, inputs, outputs, and enabled AI functions to K232928 before acceptance.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-03

Later product-family features are not evidence that this cleared release includes them.

Interoperability acceptance

DICOM RT and vendor workflow integration; validate patient identity, image geometry, structures, dose, plan transfer, approvals, version compatibility, and rollback.

product family · checked 2026-09-03

Test representative identifiers, orientation, geometry, measurements, units, routing, failure handling, and round trips locally. Vendor statements are current product-family context; confirm the exact cleared release and installed options.

Clinical acceptance

Use a signed local test set for the supported population and workflow. Include common and difficult cases, exclusions, acquisition variation, failed or low-quality inputs, reviewer overrides, and downstream effects. DeepContour is not for lesion or tumor contouring. Validate the exact organ template, CT protocol, registration, RTSTRUCT export, and local review process; no generated contour may be used for treatment without qualified approval.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-03

Define stop-use, escalation, rollback, and revalidation triggers before production use.

Economic evaluation

Model capital and recurring cost against net staff time after review, throughput, repeat imaging or rework, room time, consumables, infrastructure, training, service, downtime, upgrade, and replacement costs.

product family · checked 2026-09-03

No exact-product price was found in the reviewed public material; vendor productivity claims are scenario inputs, not guaranteed local savings.

Lifecycle monitoring

Monitor by exact hardware, software, model, and algorithm version; patient population; anatomy; protocol; operator; input quality; output edits or overrides; failed studies; repeat acquisition or rework; downstream impact; downtime; incidents; recalls; and updates. Track these product-specific limits: DeepContour is not for lesion or tumor contouring. Validate the exact organ template, CT protocol, registration, RTSTRUCT export, and local review process; no generated contour may be used for treatment without qualified approval.

product family · checked 2026-09-03

Revalidate after material software, hardware, model, protocol, interface, or clinical-policy changes. Vendor statements are current product-family context; confirm the exact cleared release and installed options.

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.

Evidence summary
K232928 reports software, contour, registration, export, and workflow validation for selected adult radiotherapy patients. It does not contour tumors, does not establish a clinical outcome, and every generated structure requires qualified review and editing before planning or treatment.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03
Reported sensitivity
Not applicable
  • Not applicable
  • Not applicable
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Sensitivity is not the primary endpoint for this system, reconstruction, segmentation, guidance, or quantitative function. Use the task-specific evidence below.

Reported specificity
Not applicable
  • Not applicable
  • Not applicable
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Specificity is not the primary endpoint for this system, reconstruction, segmentation, guidance, or quantitative function. Use the task-specific evidence below.

No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.

K232928 FDA performance package for DeepContour (V1.0)

  • DesignManufacturer deep-learning contour, registration, RTSTRUCT, and software validation
  • PopulationAdult patients selected for radiotherapy planning using supported CT images and organ templates
  • Scopeexact submission
  • Tested versionDeepContour (V1.0)
  • IndependenceSponsor or vendor study

K232928

Manufacturer evidence submitted for FDA clearance or approval; local clinical, technical, and workflow acceptance remains necessary.

1 unlinked candidate evidence record is retained for source review and excluded from this evidence display.

Costs and setup

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03

No public list price for the exact cleared configuration was found. Obtain a written quote separating hardware or license basis, implementation, interfaces, infrastructure, training, service, upgrades, renewal, consumables, and exit costs.

Reimbursement and coding
No separate named-product Medicare payment was identified in the reviewed CMS radiation-oncology material. Evaluate net planning or delivery value within the radiotherapy service line.
  • Public source
  • Not applicable
  • Checked 2026-09-03

No product-specific code

No separate named-product payment identified in reviewed public material

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · United States

Build a local total-cost and value model; do not infer reimbursement from FDA clearance or approval.

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
The 2026-09-02 openFDA device-recall snapshot contained no record matched to K232928 by exact submission identifier. This does not exclude product-family, later, or adverse-event information.
  • Public source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-03

Exact-identifier review does not prove absence of all product-family safety signals.

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Human reviewedStatus
2026-09-04Last searched
25Fields reviewed
11Source classes checked
1Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

Recovered from the prior exact-submission extraction and normalized under the current provenance rules. Exact FDA decision materials were reviewed for identity, indication, users, workflow, limitations, and submitted performance. Current vendor material is labeled product-family context where it does not establish the exact release. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov results are retained as candidate evidence with version applicability pending; CMS reimbursement context and exact-identifier openFDA postmarket results were also checked. Pricing, final security architecture, contracted services, enabled options, and local interoperability remain organization-specific evidence. Automated exact-name discovery found 1 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.

Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, fda decision material, vendor product page, peer reviewed literature, clinical trial registry, reimbursement policy, fda device recall, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources & history

How this profile was documented

Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.

View source ledger and history

Source ledger

  1. K232928 FDA decision source

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-08-31

    Scope: regulatoryIdentity, purpose, modality, anatomy

  2. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-08-31

    Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext

  3. PubMed biomedical literature index

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery

  4. ClinicalTrials.gov study registry

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus

  5. openFDA Device Recall API

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-09-02

    Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching

  6. Radiation Oncology Model

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services - Accessed 2026-09-02

    Scope: reimbursement, radiationTherapyPaymentContext

  7. Wisdom DeepContour

    Wisdom Technologies - Accessed 2026-09-03

    Scope: productFamilyContext, workflowRole, implementationCapabilities

  8. Uncertainty quantification for CT dosimetry based on 10 281 subjects using automatic image segmentation and fast Monte Carlo calculations.

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-03

    Scope: evidenceStudies, productFamilyContext, evidenceDiscovery

Research history

  1. K232928 FDA decision

    Regulatory record

    510(k)

  2. Source-review record updated

    Research record

    human reviewed

Alternatives

Related tools to compare

FDA-cleared K242994

OncoStudio (OS-01)

OncoSoft. Co., Ltd.

OncoStudio OS-01 creates initial deep-learning organs-at-risk contours from CT images of the head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis for radiation-oncology review, editing, and...

Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
Multi-region
Decision
2025-02-24