Calculation of percent breast density and breast-density group information (BI-RADS A+B fatty versus C+D dense) as adjunctive information for interpreting physicians assessing breast tissue composition; not a diagnostic aid.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Calculation of percent breast density and breast-density group information (BI-RADS A+B fatty versus C+D dense) as adjunctive information for interpreting physicians assessing breast tissue composition; not a diagnostic aid.
For-presentation 2D digital mammograms in RCC, LCC, RMLO, and LMLO views from compatible FFDM systems, including GE Senograph 2000D, GE Senograph DS, GE Senographe Pristina, Hologic Selenia Dimensions, and Hologic Lorad Selenia.
For each breast: breast area in cm2, fibroglandular-tissue area in cm2, and percent breast density. For each patient: BI-RADS A+B fatty versus C+D dense group information, displayed on a mammography workstation or PACS as a DICOM mammography Structured Report or secondary capture.
The packet limits input to compatible full-field digital mammography systems and for-presentation 2D digital mammograms. Results are adjunctive information and are not a diagnostic aid; no clinical study was required to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The device receives digital mammograms using standard DICOM communications and automatically transfers the DICOM summary report to a PACS; output may also be displayed as secondary capture on a mammography workstation. Specific local interface compatibility is not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for ClariSIGMAM; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
Non-clinical verification and validation compared ClariSIGMAM density estimates with expert-radiologist reference measurements, assessed reproducibility over time and between breasts, and evaluated binary density classification against a consensus of four expert readers. The reference-standard dataset had n=837; reported endpoints included kappa 0.734 (95% CI 0.688-0.781) and class-specific table percentages of 86.6% for fatty and 87.3% for dense. These are agreement or class-specific classification results, not sensitivity or specificity.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
ClariSIGMAM regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationPopulation described in the exact-submission ACR model card
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K203785
IndependenceIndependence not established
K203785
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K203785 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K203785. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify care setting and population: Confirm the intended care setting, patient population, and service line.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K203785 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
21Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
Flags calcifications, masses, asymmetries and architectural distortions on compatible FFDM or DBT screening examinations; management must not be based solely on MammoScreen output.
BAC processes screening FFDM and DBT mammograms to detect the presence or absence of breast arterial calcifications at study and breast level and localize detected calcifications...
Tags screening cases as suspicious or blank to aid worklist prioritization; radiologists must review every examination and it does not mark original images.