Assist trained healthcare practitioners in viewing, analyzing, quantifying, and evaluating MR brain images of adults older than 45 years, including segmentation, normative comparison, and reporting.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Assist trained healthcare practitioners in viewing, analyzing, quantifying, and evaluating MR brain images of adults older than 45 years, including segmentation, normative comparison, and reporting.
DICOM brain MR images using supported protocols, including T1-weighted MPRAGE or similar data and T2-weighted FLAIR; DWI data is also accepted; labeled population is adults older than 45 years.
Automated segmentation and quantification of brain structures and white matter hyperintensities; normative age-matched percentile comparisons; white-matter-hyperintensity volume/map, deviation maps, diffusion analysis, longitudinal comparisons, numerical values, graphs, anatomical images, and graphical color overlays; DICOM-encapsulated PDF report.
The labeled population is adults older than 45 years and use is by trained practitioners familiar with MR post-processing. Supported DICOM protocols and the report workflow are required; exact local interfaces and current deployment configuration require confirmation.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
DICOM input through supported protocols and automatic transfer of a DICOM-encapsulated PDF report to PACS are described. The architecture is a cloud solution with edge components deployed on hospital IT or customer premise; exact interface versions and routing behavior are not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for CDM Insights; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA K240680 describes performance testing of image-processing accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, and normative percentiles. Segmentation testing used 60 cases against U.S. board-certified neuroradiologist ground truth; white matter hyperintensity Dice was 0.66 (SD 0.15), and eight cortical-region mean Dice values ranged from 0.58 to 0.72. Repeatability used 121 healthy individuals with repeated scans, reproducibility used more than 1,500 subjects, and percentile accuracy used almost 2,000 independent test scans from 13 source cohorts. The packet states that prespecified acceptance criteria were met.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
CDM Insights regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K240680
IndependenceIndependence not established
K240680
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K240680 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K240680. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K240680 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Awaiting review PubMed leads
0Awaiting review trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 2 history items
ANDI 2.2 processes brain MR images for atlas-assisted visualization, segmentation and volumetric quantification, presenting adjunctive DICOM-readable information for trained...
Neurophet AQUA is intended for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images; volumetric...
Morph automatically labels, visualizes, and volumetrically quantifies segmentable brain structures from MR images and may compare measurements with reference percentile data; it...