Input or output interoperability
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
FDA-cleared profile
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center: AIM
Autoplaque is intended to provide an optimized non-invasive application to analyze coronary anatomy and pathology and aid in determining treatment paths from a set of Computed Tomography (CT) Angiographic images. Autoplaque is a workstation-based post processing application. It is a non-invasive diagnostic reading software intended for use by cardiologists and radiologists as an interactive tool for viewing and analyzing cardiac CT data for determining the presence and extent of coronary plaques and luminal stenoses. The software is not intended to replace the skill and judgment of a qualified medical practitioner and should only be used by people who have been appropriately trained in the software's functions, capabilities and limitations. Users should be aware that certain views make use of interpolated data. This is data that is created by the software based on the original data set. Interpolated data may give the appearance of healthy tissue in situations where pathology that is near or smaller than the scanning resolution may be present. Autoplaque must be installed on a suitable commercial computer platform. It is the user's responsibility to ensure the monitor quality and ambient light conditions are consistent with the clinical applications. Typical users of Autoplaque are trained medical professionals, including but not limited to radiologists, clinicians, technologists, and others.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Intended-user text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Confirm the intended care setting, patient population, and service line.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Clinical output reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Limitations and supported-acquisition details reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
Scanner manufacturers: All
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm currently supported software versions, protocols, and site-specific acquisition configurations.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for Autoplaque; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-08Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Structured study metadata from the exact-submission ACR model card; this is not an independent evidence synthesis.
This field has not been curated yet.
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K212758
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public price or quote for the exact K212758 configuration was established in this review.
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR and official vendor material provide bounded catalog or product-family context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 17 PubMed and 2 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: identity, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, workflow, evidence, implementation
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: intendedUsers, output, limitations, evidenceSummary, integration, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: postmarketSafety
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
fda record reviewed
Alternatives
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
An extension for syngo.via that assists trained physicians with automated and semi-automated analysis, visualization and reporting of cardiac CT angiography volume datasets for...
Keya Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
Coronary plaque and stenosis quantification from CCTA
Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.
AV Cardiac CT assists radiologists, cardiologists and 3D technologists with viewing, processing and analysis of gated cardiac CT data, including coronary anatomy and cardiac...
Canon Medical Informatics, Inc.
CT VScore+ evaluates calcified coronary lesions on ECG-gated, non-contrast cardiac CT in patients aged 30 years or older, automatically generating coronary calcium scores and...