FDA-cleared profile
Quantitative Radiology Solutions, LLC
AAR generates initial organ-at-risk contours from adult noncontrast CT of the head, neck, and thorax for transfer into radiation treatment planning.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Public materials reviewed for this batch do not establish the complete security posture for the exact release. Request data-flow, identity, audit, encryption, retention, support-access, vulnerability-management, backup, and incident-response evidence.
Map the installed model, build, options, population, anatomy, inputs, and outputs to K203610 before acceptance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Later product-family features are not evidence that this cleared release includes them.
Cloud software on Linux with DICOM 3.0 CT input and TPS output; validate transfer, structure naming, supported anatomy, noncontrast protocols, editing, approval, and failed-case quarantine.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Test representative identifiers, orientation, geometry, measurements, units, routing, failure handling, and round trips locally.
Use a signed local test set for the supported population and workflow. Include common and difficult cases, exclusions, acquisition variation, failed or low-quality inputs, reviewer overrides, and downstream effects. Not for patients younger than 18, abdomen or pelvis, contrast CT, dose calculation, registration, plan optimization, or contour editing. A third-party TPS must display and edit every contour.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Define stop-use, escalation, rollback, and revalidation triggers before production use.
Model capital and recurring cost against net staff time after review, throughput, repeat imaging or rework, room time, consumables, infrastructure, training, service, downtime, upgrade, and replacement costs.
product family · checked 2026-09-03Vendor productivity claims are scenario inputs, not guaranteed local savings.
Monitor by exact hardware, software and model version, patient population, anatomy, protocol, operator, input quality, output edits or overrides, failed studies, repeat acquisition or rework, downstream impact, downtime, incidents, recalls, and updates. Track the limits that matter for this product: Not for patients younger than 18, abdomen or pelvis, contrast CT, dose calculation, registration, plan optimization, or contour editing. A third-party TPS must display and edit every contour.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-03Revalidate after material software, hardware, model, protocol, interface, or clinical-policy changes.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Sensitivity is not the primary applicable endpoint for this acquisition, reconstruction, segmentation, planning, guidance, or quantitative-biomarker function. Use the task-specific endpoints and tested population reported below.
Specificity is not the primary applicable endpoint for this acquisition, reconstruction, segmentation, planning, guidance, or quantitative-biomarker function. Use the task-specific endpoints and tested population reported below.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K203610
Manufacturer evidence submitted for substantial equivalence; local clinical, technical, and workflow acceptance remains necessary.
PMC6122857
Supports algorithm-family context only; artifact burden, anatomy, and contour definition affect performance.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public list price for the exact cleared configuration was found. Obtain a written quote separating hardware or license basis, enabled features, implementation, interfaces, infrastructure, training, service, upgrades, renewal, consumables, and exit costs.
No separate named-product payment identified in reviewed public material
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · United StatesBuild a local total-cost and value model; do not infer reimbursement from FDA clearance.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
A zero-result exact-identifier search does not prove that no recall, correction, adverse-event report, or product-family safety signal exists.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Recovered from the prior exact-submission extraction and normalized under the current provenance rules. Exact FDA materials, current product-family sources, selected clinical literature, reimbursement context, and exact-identifier recall candidates were reviewed. Pricing, contracted services, enabled options, final security architecture, and local interoperability remain organization-specific evidence. Automated exact-name discovery found 20 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, peer reviewed publication, reimbursement policy, fda device recall, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, purpose, modality, anatomy
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: reimbursement, radiationTherapyPaymentContext
Scope: limitations, evidenceSummary, evidenceStudy, evidenceMetrics, monitoring
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
human reviewed
Alternatives
Informai
RadOncAI provides AI-guided dose prediction from CT simulation and clinician-defined treatment-planning structures for adult head-and-neck malignant or benign disease.
Aitewan Biomedical Technology, Inc.
DeepBT Detector-Plus provides initial gross-tumor-volume contours on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced and optional T2-weighted MR images for radiation-treatment planning in adults...
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
AI-Rad Companion Organs RT VA70 automatically contours predefined structures, including known diagnosed brain metastases, on DICOM CT and MR images for radiation therapy planning;...
Radformation, Inc.
AutoContour Model RADAC V5 assists radiation treatment planners with contouring and reviewing structures in medical images for radiation therapy treatment planning. It produces...